4.5 Article

Solicitation displays reliably reflect oxidative damage in barn swallow nestlings

Journal

BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages 539-546

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00265-011-1302-3

Keywords

Antioxidants; Honest signalling; Oxidative stress; Parent-offspring communication; Parental care; Sibling competition

Funding

  1. Ministero dell'Universita e della Ricerca, Italy
  2. Marie Curie Intra-European Fellowship [PIEF-GA-2009-252120]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Reproduction entails parental decisions over allocation of limiting resources. 'Begging' solicitation displays by the offspring have been hypothesised to evolve as reliable indicators of quality, allowing parents to adopt optimal allocation strategies. To function as such, however, begging signals must covary with offspring traits that affect viability. Here we tested whether oxidative damage of nestling barn swallows predicts begging bout duration, call amplitude and intensity of postural displays both under normal food provisioning and under food shortage. Oxidative damage as determined by normal metabolism, pathological conditions and functioning of the immune system can serve as a comprehensive indicator of offspring condition because it can profoundly affect viability, senescence and reproduction. Begging bout duration was negatively predicted by oxidative damage but only after food deprivation. Postural begging negatively covaried with oxidative damage, at least when nestlings were confronted with related nest mates. Plasma antioxidant capacity did not predict begging behaviour. Thus, we show for the first time that behavioural begging covaries with a comprehensive index of chick condition, lending support to reliability of such begging traits also as signals of quality rather than need or hunger only. Future studies are candidate to decouple the effect of hunger state and individual condition on behavioural begging.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available