4.5 Article

Individual recognition and potential recognition errors in parent-offspring communication

Journal

BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY
Volume 64, Issue 10, Pages 1515-1525

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00265-010-0965-5

Keywords

Parent-offspring recognition; Brood division; Begging; Parental care; Bioacoustics; Taeniopygia guttata

Funding

  1. DFG [FO 340/1-2]
  2. Volkswagen Foundation [I/82-747]
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation [PA00A-111437]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The recognition of food-provisioning parents is crucial for fledglings of many bird species. Vocalizations are the most commonly used cues in avian parent-offspring communication, and it has been shown in several species that fledglings respond specifically to their parents' contact calls. However, fledglings occasionally also react to unrelated adults. Such responses may reflect recognition errors or alternatively a strategy of fledglings to obtain food or other direct benefits from unrelated adult birds. In a playback experiment, we tested whether zebra finch Taeniopygia guttata fledglings perceive variation in adult call signatures to recognize their parents and whether the propensity to respond to unrelated individuals is related to the gender of adults and to signal properties of male and female calls. Male calls are learnt and show high intra-sexual variation, which may improve the accurate recognition of the father's individual signature. In contrast, calls of adult females are innate, show lower intra-sexual variation such that the mother's call is more likely to be confused with another female call. We demonstrate that fledglings are able to recognize their parents. In addition, fledglings reacted more strongly to unrelated females compared with unrelated males. Our findings suggest that responses to unrelated adults may reflect recognition errors and indicate the importance of variation in identity signals for individual recognition processes in parent-offspring communication.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available