4.5 Article

Digit ratio (2D:4D) and dominance rank in female rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta)

Journal

BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY
Volume 64, Issue 6, Pages 1001-1009

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00265-010-0915-2

Keywords

Primates; Prenatal androgens; Prenatal programming; Competition; Aggression; Dominance rank

Funding

  1. National Center for Research Resources (NCRR), National Institutes of Health (NIH) [P40RR003640]
  2. University of Liverpool
  3. British Academy Centenary Project
  4. British Association of Biological Anthropology and Osteoarchaeology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Female rhesus macaques exhibit matrilineal dominance structures, and high dominance rank confers fitness benefits across a lifetime and across generations. Rank effects are inherited through social processes that are well understood; however, biological mechanisms that might impact these processes are not well known. Recently, it has been shown that prenatal androgens appear to be implicated in supporting dominance rank hierarchies in some mammals. In humans, interindividual differences in the second (index) to fourth (ring) digit ratio (2D:4D) have been linked indirectly to variation in prenatal androgens, with low 2D:4D in both sexes associated with higher inferred prenatal androgen effects. 2D:4D has also been related to dominant social behavior and has been shown to co-vary with social systems across nonhuman primate species. Here, we investigate how 2D:4D co-varies with socially inherited dominance rank in female rhesus macaques. Low 2D:4D was associated with higher-ranking females, while higher 2D:4D was associated with lower-ranking females. Similar relationships were also shown between ranked families within matrilines. This is the first study to show such a relationship between 2D:4D and dominance rank in a nonhuman primate and suggests that prenatal androgen effects could be involved in the maintenance of dominance rank in female cercopithecine primates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available