4.5 Article

Behavioural trait assortment in a social network: patterns and implications

Journal

BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY
Volume 63, Issue 10, Pages 1495-1503

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00265-009-0802-x

Keywords

Behavioural phenotype; Co-operation; Evolutionary graph theory; Guppy; Personality; Poecilia reticulata; Predator inspection

Funding

  1. NERC [NE/E001181/1]
  2. EPSRC [GR/T11241/01(P)]
  3. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/D011035/1, NE/E001181/1, NE/E001181/2] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. NERC [NE/D011035/1, NE/E001181/2, NE/E001181/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The social fine structure of a population plays a central role in ecological and evolutionary processes. Whilst many studies have investigated how morphological traits such as size affect social structure of populations, comparatively little is known about the influence of behaviours such as boldness and shyness. Using information on social interactions in a wild population of Trinidadian guppies (Poecilia reticulata), we construct a social network. For each individual in the network, we quantify its behavioural phenotype using two measures of boldness, predator inspection tendency, a repeatable and reliably measured behaviour well studied in the context of co-operation, and shoaling tendency. We observe striking heterogeneity in contact patterns, with strong ties being positively assorted and weak ties negatively assorted by our measured behavioural traits. Moreover, shy fish had more network connections than bold fish and these were on average stronger. In other words, social fine structure is strongly influenced by behavioural trait. We assert that such structure will have implications for the outcome of selection on behavioural traits and we speculate that the observed positive assortment may act as an amplifier of selection contributing to the maintenance of co-operation during predator inspection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available