4.8 Article

Heterogeneous expression of gap junction channels in the heart leads to conduction defects and ventricular dysfunction

Journal

CIRCULATION
Volume 104, Issue 10, Pages 1194-1199

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/hc3601.093990

Keywords

ion channels; contractility; conduction; genes; arrhythmia

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [1-SS10-RR-09145-01] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL-04222, HL-39707, R01 HL064757, HL-30557, HL-64757] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background-Heterogeneous remodeling of gap junctions is observed in many forms of heart disease. The consequent loss of synchronous ventricular activation has been hypothesized to result in diminished cardiac performance. To directly test this hypothesis, we designed a murine model of heterogeneous gap junction channel expression. Methods and Results-We generated chimeric mice formed from connexin43 (Cx43)-deficient embryonic stein cells and wild-type or genetically marked ROSA26 recipient blastocysts. Chimeric mice developed normally, without histological evidence of myocardial fibrosis or hypertrophy. Heterogeneous Cx43 expression resulted in conduction defects, however, as well as markedly depressed contractile function. Optical mapping of chimeric hearts by use of voltage-sensitive dyes revealed highly irregular epicardial conduction patterns, quantified as significantly greater negative curvature of the activation wave front (-1.86+/-0.40 mm in chimeric mice versus -0.86+/-0.098 mm. in controls; P<0.01; n=6 for each group). Echocardiographic studies demonstrated significantly reduced fractional shortening in chimeric mice (26.6+/-2.3% versus 36.5+/-1.6% in age-matched 129/SvXC57BL/6F1 wild-type controls; P<0.05). Conclusions-These data suggest that heterogeneous Cx43 expression, by perturbing the normal pattern of coordinated myocardial excitation, may directly depress cardiac performance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available