4.0 Article

Sex matters: secular and geographical trends in sex differences in coronary heart disease mortality

Journal

BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL
Volume 323, Issue 7312, Pages 541-545

Publisher

BRITISH MED JOURNAL PUBL GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.323.7312.541

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective To examine secular trends and geographical variations in sex differences in mortality from coronary heart disease and investigate how these relate to distributions in risk factors. Design National and international data were used to examine secular trends and geographical variations in sex differences in mortality from coronary heart disease and risk factors. Setting England and Wales, 1921-98; Australia, France,japan, Sweden, and the United States, 1947-97; 50 countries, 1992-6. Data sources Office for National Statistics, World Health Organization, and Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Results The 20th century epidemic of coronary heart disease affected only men in most industrialised countries and had a very rapid onset in England and Wales, which has been examined in detail. If this male only epidemic had not occurred there would have been 1.2 million fewer deaths from coronary heart disease in men in England and Wales over the past 50 years. Secular trends in mean per capita fat consumption show a similar pattern to secular trends in coronary heart disease mortality in mn. Fat consumption is positively correlated with coronary heart disease mortality in men (r,=0.79; 95% confidence interval 0.70 to 0.86) and inversely associated with coronary heart disease mortality in women (-0.30; -0.49 to -0.08) over this time. Although sex ratios for mortality from coronary heart disease show a clear period effect, those for lung cancer show a cohort effect. Sex ratios for stroke mortality were constant and close to unity for the entire period. Geographical variations in the sex ratio for coronary heart disease were associated with mean per capita fat consumption (0.64; 0.44 to 0.78) but were not associated with the sex ratio for smoking. Conclusion Sex differences are largely the result of environmental factors and hence not inevitable. Understanding the factors that determine sex differences has important implications for public health, particularly for countries and parts of countries where the death rates for coronary heart disease are currently increasing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available