4.5 Article

Mate-choice copying by female zebra finches, Taeniopygia guttata: what happens when model females provide inconsistent information?

Journal

BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY
Volume 63, Issue 2, Pages 269-276

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00265-008-0658-5

Keywords

Behavioural plasticity; Inconsistent information; Mate-choice copying; Monogamous species; Zebra finches

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (Canada)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

For a long time, mate-choice copying was thought to be restricted to lekking and polygynous species. Yet, recent experimental studies revealed that social information can play a role in the evolution of mate preferences in monogamous species with biparental care. However, this phenomenon has been demonstrated only under particular conditions and the prevalence and importance of this phenomenon therefore remains to be evaluated. In particular, previous laboratory experiments have consisted in exposing test females to only one paired male at a time, while under natural conditions monogamous females are likely to observe the choice of several females before making a decision. Thus, in the present study, female zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) could observe two model females simultaneously, that provided either inconsistent or consistent information, depending on whether they were interacting with different types of males or with males of a same phenotype. We found that the relative importance given to private and social information on females' preferences varied with the consistency of social information and females significantly changed their preference only when social information was consistent. There was, nevertheless, a large variation in their responses. We suggest that such variations could be due to the fact that the benefits of mate-choice copying are frequency-dependent, and that this constrain would further contribute to limit the use of social information in monogamous species.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available