4.8 Article

Inhibition of transcription factor-DNA complexes and gene expression by a microgonotropen

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.191374698

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [P30 CA016056, CA16056] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [5R37DK0917136] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Developing minor groove-binding drugs to selectively inhibit transcription factor (TF)/DNA interactions and accompanying gene expression is a current goal in drug development studies. Equipping minor groove-binding agents with positively charged, major groove-contacting side chains yields microgonotropens (MGTs). Previously, we demonstrated that MGTs were superior inhibitors of TF/DNA complexes in cell-free assays compared with classical groove binders, but MGTs showed limited ability to inhibit gene expression. To determine what chemical characteristics contribute to or improve activity, we evaluate five MGTs for their effectiveness in inhibiting TF complex formation and resultant transcription by using the c-fos serum response element (SRE) as a target. MGT Ll binds DNA via a bisbenzimidazole equipped with a tripyrrole moiety. It is compared with analog L2, which has been functionalized with propylamines on each of the three pyrroles. L2, which binds DNA at subpicomolar concentrations, was at least three orders of magnitude more potent than L1 at inhibiting TF binding to the c-fos SIRE in cell-free assays. Unlike Li and previous MGTs, L2 also inhibited endogenous c-fos expression in NIH 3T3 cells at micromolar levels, Structure/activity relationships suggest that, although the tripyrrole/polyamine functional group of L2 may be largely responsible for its inhibition of TF complexes in cell-free assays, its bisbenzimidazole moiety appears to impart improved cellular uptake and activity. These findings make L2 a promising lead candidate for future, rational MGT design.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available