4.8 Article

Distinct effects of cAMP and mitogenic signals on CREB-binding protein recruitment impart specficity to target gene activation via CREB

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.191152098

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01-GM37828, R37 GM037828] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ser-133 phosphorylation of the cAMP-responsive element-binding protein (CREB) is sufficient to induce cellular gene expression in response to cAMP, but additional promoter-bound factors are required for target gene activation by CREB in response to nitogen/stress signals. To compare the relative effects of different signals on recruitment of the coactivator CREB-binding protein (CBP) to CREB in living cells, we developed a fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) assay. cAMP promoted the interaction of CREB with CBP in a phosphorylation-dependent manner by FRET analysis, but nitogen/stress signals were far less effective in stimulating complex formation even though they induced comparable levels of Ser-133 phosphorylation. cAMP and non-cAMP stimuli were comparably active in promoting this interaction in the cytosol; the formation of CREB-CBP complexes in response to non-cAMP signals was specifically inhibited in the nucleus. Non-cAMP signals had no effect on intrinsic CREB- or CBP-binding activities by Far Western blot assay, thereby supporting the presence of a distinct CREB-CBP antagonist. Our studies indicate that the relative effects of cAMP and nitogen/stress signals on CREB-CBP complex formation impart selectivity to gene activation through CREB phosphorylated at Ser-133.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available