4.4 Article

The reaction of yeast cystathionine β-synthase is rate-limited by the conversion of aminoacrylate to cystathionine

Journal

BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 40, Issue 36, Pages 10873-10880

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi011087j

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM55749] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Our studies of the reaction mechanism of cystathionine beta -synthase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae (yeast) are facilitated by the spectroscopic properties of the pyridoxal phosphate coenzyme that forms a series of intermediates in the reaction Of L-serine and L-homocysteine to form L-cystathionine. To characterize these reaction intermediates, we have carried out rapid-scanning stopped-flow and single-wavelength stopped-flow kinetic measurements under pre-steady-state conditions, as well as circular dichroism and fluorescence spectroscopy under steady-state conditions. We find that the gem-diamine and external aldimine of aminoacrylate are the primary intermediates in the forward half-reaction with L-serine and that the external aldimine of aminoacrylate or its complex with L-homocysteine is the primary intermediate in the reverse half-reaction with L-cystathionine. The second forward half-reaction of aminoacrylate with L-homocysteine is rapid. No primary kinetic isotope effect was obtained in the forward half-reaction with L-serine. The results provide evidence (1) that the formation of the external aldimine of L-Serine is faster than the formation of the aminoacrylate intermediate, (2) that aminoacrylate is formed by the concerted removal of the alpha -proton and the hydroxyl group Of L-serine, and (3) that the rate of the overall reaction is rate-limited by the conversion of aminoacrylate to L-cystathionine. We compare our results with cystathionine beta -synthase with those of related investigations of tryptopban synthase and O-acetylserine sulfhydrylase.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available