4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Hydrogen cyanide and carbon monoxide in blood of convicted dead in a polyurethane combustion: a proposition for the data analysis

Journal

FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL
Volume 121, Issue 1-2, Pages 140-143

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0379-0738(01)00464-9

Keywords

carbon monoxide; hydrogen cyanide; fire deaths; lethality values

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Carbon monoxide is a well-known toxic component in fire atmospheres. However, the importance of hydrogen cyanide as a toxic agent in fire causalities is under discussion. A tragic polyurethane mattress fire provoked death of 35 convicts in a prison (Unit I, Olmos, Penitenciary Service of Buenos Aires Province, Argentina), in 1990. There is no report of any investigation carried out with such a large amount of victims in Argentina. Carboxihemoglobin (COHb) and hydrogen cyanide (HCN) were quantified in victims blood to elucidate the cause of the death. Saturation of COHb ranged between 4 and 18%, and HCN 2.0-7.2 mg/l. These latter values were higher than the lethal levels reported in literature. Other toxic components routinely measured (ethanol, methanol, aldehydes and other volatile Compounds) gave negative results on the 35 cases. Neither drugs of abuse nor psychotropics were detected. Statistical chi (2) analysis was applied to find differences between HCN and COHb concentrations. Saturation of COHb and HCN in blood were not independent variables (chi (2) = 8.25). Moreover, the ratio COHb/HCN was constant (0.47 +/- 0.04). In order to evaluate the contribution of each toxic to the diagnosis, a lethal index was defined for each toxic (LICO and LIHCN). The most probable cause of death could be inferred by a suitable plot of both indexes. The results indicated that death in the 35 fire victims was probably caused by HCN, generated during the extensive polyurethane decomposition provoked by a rapid increase of temperature. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available