Journal
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 154, Issue 6, Pages 557-562Publisher
OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/154.6.557
Keywords
anti-inflammatory agents; non-steroidal; cohort studies; drug evaluation; observation; pharmacoepidemiology; ulcer
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Observational data are well suited for many types of medical research, especially when randomized controlled trials are inappropriate. However, some researchers have attempted to justify routine use of observational data in situations in which randomized controlled trials are normally conducted. Literature searches cannot be used to directly compare the results of the two types of research, because invalid observational studies normally are not publishable in the journal literature. The author created a study (1989-1994) to determine the efficacy of one exposure (ulcer-healing drugs) in preventing the serious upper gastrointestinal toxicity associated with another exposure (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)). A cohort of subjects from Tayside, Scotland, receiving both NSAIDs and ulcer-healing drugs appeared to experience a large rise in their risk of gastric bleeding and perforation (e.g., the rate ratio was 10.00 (95% confidence interval: 6.68, 14.97) when this cohort was compared with one receiving NSAIDs alone). This increased risk was due to confounding. Thus, use of a restricted cohort design was not able to eliminate uncontrollable bias. It is possible that if many different studies were carried outs then observational research would be found to be only occasionally useful for studying drug efficacy.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available