4.5 Article

Fiery frills: carotenoid-based coloration predicts contest success in frillneck lizards

Journal

BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages 1138-1149

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/art041

Keywords

Chlamydosaurus kingii; color signal; communication; fighting ability; reflectance; visual modeling

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council
  2. Australian Geographic Seed Grant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Conspicuous color signals are commonly used by a wide diversity of animals to advertise some specific aspect of their competitive ability. In particular, orange and red colors are often used as an aggressive signal to potential rivals. The iconic Australian frillneck lizard (Chlamydosaurus kingii) has a large and extensible frill that varies geographically in the extent of yellow, orange, and red present. Focusing on the red-orange lizards found in Western Australia, we first established that, in contrast to most lizards studied to date, the red-orangecolored frill is carotenoid rather than pterin based. Second, we measured chromatic and achromatic aspects of male frills before staging dyadic contests between males to determine whether color is used to signal fighting ability. Both chromatic and achromatic measures of the red-orange patches on the lizards frills, as well as similarly colored patches on their throats, were reliable predictors of competitive ability; males possessing more colorful displays dominated size-matched competitors in dyadic contests. Apart from large differences in body size and mass (> 10%), no other colorimetrics (e.g., white patches), frill traits (e.g., size, relative and absolute patch sizes), or morphological measures (e.g., head size, bite force) were found to predict the outcome of contests. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first example of carotenoid-based patches signaling male fighting ability in a lizard.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available