4.7 Article

Echocardiographic features of the right heart in sleep-disordered breathing - The Framingham Heart Study

Journal

Publisher

AMER THORACIC SOC
DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm.164.6.2001092

Keywords

cohort study; echocardiography; epidemiology; obesity; right ventricle; sleep-disordered breathing

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [N01-HC-38038, U01-HL53941] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [5-R01-NS-17950] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effect of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) on right heart structure and function is controversial. Studies of patients referred for evaluation of possible sleep apnea have yielded conflicting results, and the impact of SDB on the right heart has not been investigated In the general population. We examined the echocardiographic features of subjects with SDB at the Framingham Heart Study site of the Sleep Heart Health Study. Of 1,001 polysomnography subjects, 90 with SDB defined as a respiratory disturbance index (RDI) score >90th percentile (mean RDI = 42) were compared with 90 low-RDI subjects (mean RDI = 5) matched for age, sex, and body mass index. Right heart measurements, made without knowledge of clinical status, were compared between groups. The majority of the subjects were male (74%). After multivariable adjustment, right ventricle (RV) wall thickness was significantly greater (p = 0.005) in subjects with SDB (0.78 +/- 0.02 cm) than in the low-RDI subjects (0.68 +/- 0.02 cm). Right atria] dimensions, RV dimensions, and RV systolic function were not found to be significantly different between subjects with SDB and the low-RD[ subjects. We conclude that in this community-based study of SDB and right heart echocardiographic features, RV wall thickness was increased in subjects with SDB. Whether the RV hypertrophy observed in persons with SDB Is associated with increased morbidity and mortality remains unknown.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available