4.5 Article

Pathogen disgust predicts women's preferences for masculinity in men's voices, faces, and bodies

Journal

BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY
Volume 24, Issue 2, Pages 373-379

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/ars173

Keywords

mate preferences; pathogens; sexual dimorphism

Funding

  1. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/I031022/1]
  2. European Research Council (OCMATE) [282655]
  3. ESRC [ES/I031022/2, ES/I031022/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/I031022/1, ES/I031022/2] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. European Research Council (ERC) [282655] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent studies suggest that pathogen-related factors may contribute to systematic variation in women's preferences for masculinity in men's faces. However, there is very little evidence for similar correlations between pathogen-related factors and women's preferences for masculinity in other domains (e.g., men's voices or bodies). Consequently, we conducted a series of studies to examine whether pathogen disgust (assessed using Tybur et al's Three Domains of Disgust Scale) predicts individual differences in women's preferences for masculine characteristics in men's voices, bodies, and faces. We also tested if pathogen disgust predicts individual differences in measures of women's actual mate choices in the same way. We observed positive correlations between women's pathogen disgust and their preferences for masculinity in men's voices (Study 1) and faces and bodies (Study 2). We also observed positive correlations between women's pathogen disgust and their masculinity ratings of both their current and ideal romantic partners (Study 3). Each of these correlations was independent of the possible effects of women's sexual and moral disgust. Together, these findings suggest that individual differences in pathogen disgust predict individual differences in women's masculinity preferences across multiple domains and may also predict individual differences in their actual mate choices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available