4.5 Article

Male greater sac-winged bats gain direct fitness benefits when roosting in multimale colonies

Journal

BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages 597-606

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/ars003

Keywords

female-biased dispersal; lifetime breeding success; male tenure; Saccopteryx bilineata; social organization

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [Vo 890/3, MA1737/4]
  2. National Geographic Society
  3. German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD)
  4. Ilse and Dr Alexander Mayer Stiftung
  5. German Merit Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Social groups that are characterized by the presence of male kin are rare in mammals. Theory predicts that males reproducing in such groups need to overcome the costs of local mate competition, which are supposedly severe in polygynous or promiscuous mating systems. Here, we studied in a polygynous mammal with male philopatry whether male group size renders direct fitness benefits for males that could outweigh the costs of competing with related males for access to territories and mates. We used long-term behavioral observations and genetic data of the greater sac-winged bat to investigate the factors affecting lifetime breeding success (LBS) of harem males living in colonies that contain varying numbers of male residents. We show that tenure of harem males increased with the number of male coresidents and that harem male tenure explained a large proportion of variation in their LBS. Thus, our results provide evidence that males gain direct fitness benefits from a social organization in colonies that include additional harem territories and nonharem males. Immigration of males into colonies was significantly lower when nonharem males (young males that are often related to harem males) were permanently present in colonies, suggesting that larger male groups may be better able to maintain a patriline in a colony and thus also ensure future indirect fitness benefits.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available