4.0 Article

Antidepressants as risk factor for ischaemic heart disease: case-control study in primary care

Journal

BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL
Volume 323, Issue 7314, Pages 666-669

Publisher

BRITISH MED JOURNAL PUBL GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.323.7314.666

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives To determine whether antidepressants are a risk factor for ischaemic heart disease and tp compare the risk for different subgroups of antidepressants and individual antidepressants. Design Case-control study. Setting Nine general practices recruited from the Trent Focus Collaborative Research Network, Participants 933 men and women with ischaemic heart disease matched by age, sex, and practice to 5516 controls. Main outcome measure Adjusted odds ratio for ischaemic heart disease calculated by logistic regression. Results Odds ratios for ischaemic heart disease were significantly raised for patients who had ever received a prescription for tricyclic antidepressants even after diabetes, hypertension, smoking, body mass index, and use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors had been adjusted for (1.56; 95% confidence interval 1.18 to 2.05). Patients who had ever taken dosulepin (dothiepin) had a significantly raised odds ratio for ischaemic heart disease after adjustment for confounding factors and use of other antidepressants (1.67, 1.17 to 2.36), There was no significant increase in the odds ratios for amitriptyline, lofepramine, and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in multivariate analysis. Increasing maximum doses of dosulepin were associated with increasing odds ratios for ischaemic heart disease. Similarly, there was a significant positive trend associated with increasing numbers of prescriptions of dosulepin (adjusted odds ratio 1.52 for 1 prescription, 1.39 for 2-3, and 1.96 for greater than or equal to4,P<0.002). Conclusion There is good evidence for an association between dosulepin and subsequent ischaemic heart disease and for a dose-response relation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available