4.5 Article

Quantitative genetics and fitness consequences of neophilia in zebra finches

Journal

BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages 126-134

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arq184

Keywords

behavioral syndromes; extrapair paternity; fitness landscapes; mating preferences; operational sex ratio; reproductive success; sexual selection; temperament

Funding

  1. German Research Council (DFG) [FO 340/1-2, FO 340/1-3]
  2. Max Planck Society

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Consistent between-individual differences in context-general behavioral traits (often called personality traits) are particularly interesting for behavioral ecologists because they might show unexpected cross-context correlations and explain maladaptive behavior. In order to understand their evolutionary significance, it is relevant to know the heritability of these traits and how they relate to reproductive success. This might give insights into selective processes that maintain variation as well as into potential trade-offs. We scored approach to novel objects of 530 captive zebra finches in a familiar environment. Scores were highly repeatable and showed substantial additive genetic variation. We measured reproductive success, promiscuity, and extrapair paternity rates under aviary conditions and calculated linear and nonlinear selection differentials based on fertilization success as well as effects on chick-rearing success of pairs. Approach to novel objects had little influence on these components of reproductive success. However, we found that the social environment ( manipulated operational sex ratios) influenced the correlation between approach to a novel object and the proportion of extrapair paternity. We also found that the sex ratio manipulation affected measures of the intensity of sexual selection. Both effects were stronger in males than in females. We conclude that despite the lack of differences in overall reproductive success, approach to novel objects reflects variation in reproductive strategies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available