4.5 Article

Examination of prior contest experience and the retention of winner and loser effects

Journal

BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages 404-409

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arp204

Keywords

contest experience; fighting ability; male-male competition; perceived RHP; Phidippus clarus; winner and loser effect

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) [229029-2004, 238882 241419]
  2. National Institute of Health [1F32GM07609101A1]
  3. Canadian Foundation for Innovation
  4. Ontario Innovation Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In many animal taxa, prior contest experience affects future performance such that winning increases the chances of winning in the future (winner effect) and losing increases the chances of losing in the future (loser effect). It is, however, not clear whether this pattern typically arises from experience effects on actual or perceived fighting ability (or both). In this study, we looked at winner and loser effects in the jumping spider Phidippus clarus. We assigned winning or losing experience to spiders and tested them against opponents of similar fighting ability in subsequent contests at 1-, 2-, 5-, and 24-h intervals. We examined the strength of winner and loser effects, how long effects persist, as well as how experience affected perceived and actual fighting ability. Our results demonstrate that winner and loser effects are of approximately the same magnitude, although loser effects last longer than winner effects. Our results also demonstrate that previous experience alters actual fighting ability because both the assessment and escalation periods were affected by experience. We suggest that the retention time of experience effects depends on expected encounter rates as well as other behavioral and ecological factors. In systems with short breeding seasons and/or rapidly fluctuating populations, context-dependent retention of experience effects may allow males to track their status relative to the fluctuating fighting ability of local competitors without paying the costs necessary to recall or assess individual competitors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available