4.7 Article

Inhibition of growth of ES-2 human ovarian cancers by bombesin antagonist RC-3095, and luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone antagonist Cetrorelix

Journal

CANCER LETTERS
Volume 171, Issue 1, Pages 37-45

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3835(01)00543-2

Keywords

cancer therapy; ovarian tumors; bombesin/gastrin-releasing peptide; luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We evaluated the effects of the bombesin/gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP) antagonist RC-3095, and the luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH) antagonist Cetrorelix, administered singly or in combination, on the growth of human ovarian carcinoma cell line ES-2, xenografted into nude mice. RC-3095 at a dose of 20 mug/day and Cetrorelix (100 mug/day), significantly reduced the volume of ES-2 tumors by 63.0% (P < 0.01) and 38.0% (P < 0.05) respectively, after 44 days of treatment, as compared with controls. The combination of RC-3095 with Cetrorelix inhibited the growth of ES-2 tumors by 66.2% (P < 0.01). Serum levels of LH were significantly decreased in the groups treated with Cetrorelix alone and/or in combination with RC-3095. RT-PCR analyses revealed that the expression of mRNA for receptors of GRP (GRPR/BRS-1) and Neuromedin B (NMBR/BRS-2) on tumors was significantly decreased in all the treated groups. The expression of mRNA for epidermal growth factor receptors (EGFR) on tumors was reduced by 36.5% (P < 0.05) in the animals treated with Cetrorelix and by 72.5% (P < 0.05) in the group that received the combination of RC-3095 with Cetrorelix. Our results indicate that the bombesin antagonist RC-3095 and the LH-RH antagonist Cetrorelix inhibit effectively the growth of ES-2 ovarian cancers in nude mice. These antagonists and their combination could be considered for the therapy of patients with ovarian cancer. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available