4.5 Article

Cues, concessions, and inheritance: dominance hierarchies in the paper wasp Polistes dominulus

Journal

BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages 773-780

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arp060

Keywords

arrival order; group formation; inheritance; Polistes

Funding

  1. Brazilian Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico [200210/2001-7]
  2. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/E017894/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. NERC [NE/E017894/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hierarchies constitute the base of many social groups. Hence, understanding how they are established is critical. Here we examine how hierarchies are formed in foundresses associations of the common paper wasp Polistes dominulus. By comparing field data with computer simulations, we evaluate order of arrival at the nest, body size, facial color patterns, and within-group kinship structure as determinants of inheritance rank. Hierarchies (ranks 1-5) were experimentally inferred for 53 nests. Overall, the order in which foundresses arrived at the nest and their body size were not significantly correlated with rank. A foundress's rank was negatively correlated with the number of full sisters it had in its group. Highly ranked wasps (ranks 1 and 2) were less likely to share a nest with their full sisters than wasps of lower rank. A wasp's rank was not determined by the relative rank of its nest-mate sisters. A foundress's rank was significantly correlated with the size of its black clypeal marks, but the number of foundresses with clypeal marks in each nest was small. On 15 of 20 nests where wasps with marks were present, only 1 wasp had such marks. Overall, our results suggest that within-group relatedness structure is important in the establishment of dominance hierarchies in P. dominulus foundress associations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available