4.3 Article

Reservoir trophic state evaluation using Landsat TM images

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION
Volume 37, Issue 5, Pages 1321-1334

Publisher

AMER WATER RESOURCES ASSOC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2001.tb03642.x

Keywords

Landsat TM; remote sensing; reservoir; trophic state

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Reservoir water quality is traditionally monitored and evaluated based on field data. Collecting and analyzing field water quality data are costly and time consuming tasks, and whether a limited number of field data truly characterize the spatial variation of the trophic state within a vast water body is often disputed. In this study we utilize Landsat TM data to estimate the water quality and trophic state of the Te-Chi reservoir in Central Taiwan. A modified multi-parameter model of Carlson's trophic state index (TSI) was developed for the Te-chi reservoir. Water quality parameters (concentration of chlorophyll-a, total phosphorous measurement, and secchi disk depth) required by the model are found to have high correlations with combinations of TM bands. Therefore, TM data are used to map the trophic state of the reservoir. TM-derived TSI maps of the reservoir reveal that, in summer, the trophic state in the reservoir generally improves from upstream to downstream and that zones of distinct trophic state exist. Atrophic state index based on secchi disk depth may give erroneous values in the upstream section of the reservoir pool due to high sediment concentration in the reservoir inflow. We conclude that the Te-Chi reservoir is eutrophic or worse in summer and meso-eutrophic in winter. Implementation of best management practices to reduce nonpoint source pollution in the upstream watershed is highly recommended. This study demonstrates the capability of mapping the trophic state in impounded water bodies using the Landsat TM data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available