4.6 Article

Testosterone administration in severe burns ameliorates muscle catabolism

Journal

CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Volume 29, Issue 10, Pages 1936-1942

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00003246-200110000-00015

Keywords

testosterone; muscle; protein synthesis; protein breakdown; burn injury; amino acid kinetics

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [M01 RR-00073] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM 57295-02] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective. To assess the effects of testosterone administration an muscle protein metabolism after severe burn injury. We hypothesized that restoration of blood testosterone concentrations would restore an important anabolic stimulus to skeletal muscle, and would further increase the anabolic response of muscle to amino acid supplementation. Design. Pre- and postintervention trial conducted between September 1997 and July 1999. Setting. Burn intensive care unit. Patients. Six severely burned male patients (> 70% total body surface area). Intervention. Testosterone enanthate, 200 mg/wk (intramuscularly), for 2 wks. Measurements and Main Results. Muscle protein synthesis, breakdown, and amino acid kinetics were determined. After a basal period in each study, we subsequently investigated the response to acute amino acid supplementation during enteral feeding. Total testosterone increased significantly from baseline to the low normal range after 1 wk, and to upper normal range after two injections (p < .001). Protein synthesis was unchanged, however, protein synthetic efficiency increased 2-fold (p < .01). Protein breakdown decreased almost 2-fold after testosterone enanthate (p < .05), resulting in an improvement in net amino acid balance to a value that was approximately zero (p < .0001). Amino acid supplementation at either time point provided no additional effects. Conclusions. Restoration of blood testosterone can ameliorate the muscle catabolism of severe burn injury with normal feedings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available