4.3 Article

Identification and functional analysis of mutations in FAD-binding domain of mitochondrial glycerophosphate dehydrogenase in Caucasian patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Journal

ENDOCRINE
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages 39-42

Publisher

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1385/ENDO:16:1:39

Keywords

mitochondrial FAD-linked glycerophosphate dehydrogenase; genetics; insulin secretion; amino acid variants; polymerase chain reaction single-stranded; conformational polymorphism

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ca2+-responsive mitochondrial FAD-linked glycerol phosphate dehydrogenase (mGPDH) is a key component of the pancreatic beta -cell glucose-sensing device. The purpose of this study was to examine the association of mutations in the cDNA coding for the FAD-binding domain of mGPDH and to explore the functional, consequences of these mutations in vitro. To investigate this association in type 2 diabetes mellitus, we studied a cohort of 168 patients with type 2 diabetes and 179 glucose-tolerant control subjects of Spanish Caucasian origin by single-stranded conformational polymorphism analysis. In vitro site-directed mutagenesis was performed in the mGPDH cDNA sequence to reproduce those mutations that produce amino acid changes in a patient with type 2 diabetes. We detected mutations in the mGPDH FAD-binding domain in a single patient, resulting in a Gly to Arg amino acid change at positions 77, 78, and 81 and a Thr to Pro at position 90. In vitro expression of the mutated constructs in Xenopus oocytes resulted in a significantly lower enzymatic activity than in cells expressing the wild-type form of the enzyme. Our results indicate that although mutations in the mGPDH gene do not appear to have a major role in type 2 diabetes mellitus, the reduction in mGPDH enzymatic activity associated with the newly described mGPDH mutations suggests that they may contribute to the disease in some patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available