Journal
BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES
Volume 33, Issue 4, Pages 289-+Publisher
CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X10001081
Keywords
-
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Anderson claims that the hypothesis of massive neural reuse is inconsistent with massive mental modularity. But much depends upon how each thesis is understood. We suggest that the thesis of massive modularity presented in Carruthers (2006) is consistent with the forms of neural reuse that are actually supported by the data cited, while being inconsistent with a stronger version of reuse that Anderson seems to support.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available