4.6 Article

Is there a relation between neuropsychologic variables and quality of life after stroke?

Journal

ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION
Volume 82, Issue 10, Pages 1360-1366

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/apmr.2001.25970

Keywords

cerebrovascular accident; neuropsychological tests; quality of life; rehabilitation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: To describe the quality of life (QOL) of stroke patients and to distill neuropsychologic predictors for poor QOL. Design: A cohort study in which patients were neuropsychologically assessed at a mean of 72.2 days after stroke, with follow-up at a mean of 9.8 months after stroke. Setting: Research department of a rehabilitation center. Patients: A consecutive sample of 164 stroke patients (mean age, 55.2yr) recruited from a university hospital, a regional hospital, and a rehabilitation center. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Orientation, memory, attention and concentration, visuospatial and visuoconstructive functions, language, and arithmetic skills were assessed with neuropsychologic tests. QOL was assessed with the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP). Results: An overall mean SIP score standard deviation of 20 +/- 11 showed that stroke has a high impact on everyday functioning. Further analyses indicated that QOL is related in particular to tests measuring spatiotemporal and/or sequential aspects of behavior. Forward/backward stepwise regression analysis (n = 106) showed that poor QOL was more likely if patients had a poor result on the Trailmaking Test (TMT) B and/or were women. Conclusion: The predictive value of the TMT is most effective and very useful because the TMT is a short and economical procedure. However, the gender-related aspects of recovery deserve more attention, as does the possible bias that can be caused by the composition of a measurement. Further research is needed to refine predictive models that are needed to facilitate the development of more adequate, individual rehabilitation programs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available