4.7 Article

Inhibition of trypsin-like cysteine proteinases (gingipains) from Porphyromonas gingivalis by tetracycline and its analogues

Journal

ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY
Volume 45, Issue 10, Pages 2871-2876

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.45.10.2871-2876.2001

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Extracellular cysteine proteinases, referred to as gingipains, are considered important virulence factors for Porphyromonas gingivalis, a bacterium recognized as a major etiologic agent of chronic periodontitis. We investigated the effect of tetracycline and its analogues, doxycycline and minocycline, on the enzymatic activities of gingipains. Tetracyclines at 100 muM totally inhibited the amidolytic activity of arginine-specific gingipains (HRgpA and RgpB). In contrast, inhibition of Kgp was less efficient and required a somewhat higher concentration of the antibiotic to achieve the same effect. Among tetracycline derivatives, the most potent gingipain inhibitor was doxycycline, followed by tetracycline and minocycline. RgpB was inhibited by doxycycline in an uncompetitive and reversible manner with a 50% inhibitory concentration of 3 muM. Significantly, inhibition was unaffected by calcium, excluding the chelating activity of tetracyclines as the mechanism of gingipain inactivation. In contrast, the inhibitory activities of the tetracyclines were reduced by cysteine, a reducing agent, suggesting an interference of the drug at the oxidative region with the catalytic system of the enzyme. Doxycycline, at 10 muM, significantly inhibited the RgpB-mediated production of vascular permeability-enhancing activity from human plasma, thus proving an effective inhibition of gingipain in vivo. These results indicate a new activity of tetracyclines as cysteine proteinase inhibitors and may explain the therapeutic efficiency of these antibiotics in the treatment of periodontitis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available