4.7 Review

Precis of neuroconstructivism: How the brain constructs cognition

Journal

BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES
Volume 31, Issue 3, Pages 321-+

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X0800407X

Keywords

brain; cognition; development; constructivism; embodiment

Funding

  1. NEST [516542, 029088]
  2. EPSRC [EP/DO62225/1]
  3. ESRC [RES-061-23-0129]
  4. MRC [G9715587, G0300188]
  5. British Academy [SC-40400]
  6. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/E001254/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. Medical Research Council [G0300188, G9715587] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. ESRC [ES/E001254/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Neuroconstructivism: How the Brain Constructs Cognition proposes a unifying framework for the study of cognitive development that brings together (1) constructivism (which views development as the progressive elaboration of increasingly complex structures), (2) cognitive neuroscience (which aims to understand the neural mechanisms underlying behavior), and (3) computational modeling (which proposes formal and explicit specifications of information processing). The guiding principle of our approach is context dependence, within and (in contrast to Marr [1982]) between levels of organization. We propose that three mechanisms guide the emergence of representations: competition, cooperation, and chronotopy; which themselves allow for two central processes: proactivity and progressive specialization. We suggest that the main outcome of development is partial representations, distributed across distinct functional circuits. This framework is derived by examining development at the level of single neurons, brain systems, and whole organisms. We use the terms encellment, embrainment, and embodiment to describe the higher-level contextual influences that act at each of these levels of organization. To illustrate these mechanisms in operation we provide case studies in early visual perception, infant habituation, phonological development, and object representations in infancy. Three further case studies are concerned with interactions between levels of explanation: social development, atypical development and within that, developmental dyslexia. We conclude that cognitive development arises from a dynamic, contextual change in embodied neural structures leading to partial representations across multiple brain regions and timescales, in response to proactively specified physical and social environment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available