4.3 Article

Effects of humic substances on fluorometric DNA quantification and DNA hybridization

Journal

JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL METHODS
Volume 47, Issue 1, Pages 73-82

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0167-7012(01)00296-2

Keywords

DNA hybridization; Hoechst dye; humics; PicoGreen

Ask authors/readers for more resources

DNA extracts from sediment and water samples are often contaminated with coextracted humic-like impurities, Estuarine humic substances and vascular plant extract were used to evaluate the effect of the presence of such impurities on DNA hybridization and quantification. The presence of humic substances and vascular plant extract interfered with the fluorometric measurement of DNA concentration using Hoechst dye H33258 and PicoGreen reagent. Quantification of DNA amended with humic substances (20-80 ng/mul) using the Hoechst dye assay was more reliable than with PicoGreen reagent. A simple procedure was developed to improve the accuracy for determining the DNA concentration in the presence of humic substances. In samples containing up to 80 ng/mul of humic acids, the fluorescence of the samples were measured twice: first without Hoechst dye to ascertain any fluorescence from impurities in the DNA sample, followed with Hoechst dye addition to obtain the total sample fluorescence. The fluorescence of the Hoechst dye-DNA complex was calculated by subtracting the fluorescence of the impurities from the fluorescence of the sample. Vascular plant extract and humic substances reduced the binding of DNA onto the nylon membrane. Low amounts (< 2.0 mug) of humic substances derived from estuarine waters did not affect the binding of 100 ng of target DNA to nylon membranes. DNA samples containing 1.0 mug of humic substances performed well in DNA hybridizations with DIG-labeled oliogonucleotide and chromosomal probes. Therefore, we suggest that DNA samples containing low concentrations of humic substances (< 20 ng/mul) could be used in quantitative membrane hybridization without further purification. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available