4.5 Article

In vitro aerosol delivery and regional airway surface liquid concentration of a liposomal cationic peptide

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
Volume 90, Issue 10, Pages 1647-1657

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/jps.1115

Keywords

cationic peptide; liposome encapsulation; nebulization efficiency; lung deposition simulation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A liposome encapsulation was optimized for the entrapment and aerosol delivery of an alpha -helical cationic peptide, CM3, which had shown good antimicrobial and antiendotoxin activity in vitro. The encapsulation procedure and the phospholipids used were selected to maximize both the encapsulation and nebulization efficiencies, without compromising liposomal integrity during nebulization. The best compromise was found with dimyristoyl phosphatidylcholine and dimyristoyl phosphatidylglycerol (3:1 molar ratio), which allowed for peptide encapsulation levels of 730 mug/mL using 30 MM lipid concentration. The aerosol produced with the selected liposomal formulation was subsequently analyzed for determination of size distribution and nebulizer efficiencies. These quantities were used as input for a mathematical lung deposition model, which predicted local lung depositions of the liposomal peptides for three models of lung geometry and breathing patterns: an adult, an 8-year-old child, and a 4-year-old child. The deposition results were then applied to a novel model of airway surface liquid in the lung to assess the concentration of the deposited peptide. The resulting concentration estimates indicate that the minimum inhibitory levels of CM3 can be reached over most part of the tracheobronchial region in the adult model, and can be exceeded throughout the same region in both pediatric model subjects, using a valved jet nebulizer with a 2.5mL volume fill. (C) 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc. and the American Pharmaceutical Association.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available