4.2 Article

Genetic and Environmental Influences on Depressive Symptoms in Chinese Adolescents

Journal

BEHAVIOR GENETICS
Volume 44, Issue 1, Pages 36-44

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10519-013-9632-8

Keywords

Adolescent; Depressive symptoms; Genetic and environmental influences; Chinese twins

Funding

  1. Knowledge Innovation Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [KSCX2-EW-J-8]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31170993, 91132728, 31300841]
  3. Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
  4. BeTwiSt of Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Adolescent depression is common and has become a major public health concern in China, yet little research has examined the etiology of depression in Chinese adolescents. In the present study, genetic and environmental influences on Chinese adolescent depressive symptoms were investigated in 1,181 twin pairs residing in Beijing, China (ages 11-19 years). Child- and parent-versions of the children's depression inventory were used to measure adolescents' depressive symptoms. For self-reports, genetic factors, shared environmental factors, and non-shared environmental factors accounted for 50, 5, and 45 % of the variation in depressive symptoms, respectively; for parent-reports, genetic factors, shared environmental factors, and non-shared environmental factors accounted for 51, 18, and 31 % of the variation, respectively. These estimates are generally consistent with previous findings in Western adolescents, supporting the cross-cultural generalizability of etiological model of adolescent depression. Neither qualitative nor quantitative sex differences were found in the etiological model. Future studies are needed to investigate how genes and environments work together (gene-environment interaction, gene-environment correlation) to influence depression in Chinese adolescents.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available