4.2 Article

Genes of Experience: Explaining the Heritability of Putative Environmental Variables Through Their Association with Behavioural and Emotional Traits

Journal

BEHAVIOR GENETICS
Volume 43, Issue 4, Pages 314-328

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10519-013-9591-0

Keywords

Aggression; Anxiety; Delinquency; Depression; Gene-environment correlation; Maternal negativity; Negative life events; Oppositionality; Paternal negativity

Funding

  1. W T Grant Foundation
  2. University of London Central Research fund
  3. Medical Research Council
  4. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/I036524/1]
  5. Leverhulme Trust [RPG-210]
  6. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/I036524/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. Medical Research Council [G9817803B, G120/635] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. ESRC [ES/I036524/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  9. MRC [G120/635] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An increasing body of evidence shows that many 'environmental' measures are heritable, indicating genetic involvement in environmental exposure (or gene-environment correlation). In the present study we attempt to clarify why three such 'environmental' measures (maternal negativity, paternal negativity and negative life events) are consistently found to be heritable. Through multivariate genetic analysis of a sample of adolescent twins from the UK we show that the heritability of these putative environmental measures can be explained via their association with five behavioural phenotypes: oppositionality, delinquency, physical aggression, depression and anxiety. This is consistent with the notion that being genetically susceptible to certain behavioural difficulties could lead to exposure to certain life events, and this may account for the reported heritability of 'environmental' measures. Results are discussed in the context of possible active, evocative and passive gene-environment correlations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available