4.4 Article

Influence of baseline hematocrit and hemodilution on BOLD fMRI activation

Journal

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages 1055-1062

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0730-725X(01)00460-X

Keywords

BOLD; hematocrit; hemodilution; fMRI

Funding

  1. NIDA NIH HHS [DA00064, DA09448, DA04059, DA00329, DA00297] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [NS37483] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Current understanding of blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) fMRI physiology predicts a close relationship between BOLD signal and blood hematocrit level. However, neither this relationship nor its effect on BOLD percent activation (BPA) has been empirically examined in man. To that end, BPA in primary visual cortex in response to photic stimulation was determined in a group of 24 normal subjects. A positive linear relationship between BPA and hematocrit was seen, particularly in men. To evaluate the effect of change in hematocrit on BPA, 9 men were studied before and following isotonic saline, hemodilution, resulting in an average 6% reduction in hematocrit and an 8-31% reduction in BPA. No significant change in the number of activated pixels was seen. A model of predicted BPA as a function of hematocrit and vessel size was developed, and results from this model closely mirrored the empiric data. These results suggest that hematocrit significantly influences the magnitude of BPA and that such baseline factors should be accounted for when comparing BOLD data across groups of subjects, particularly in the many instances in which hematocrit may vary systematically. Such instances include several disease states as well as studies involving sex differences, drug administration, stress and other factors. Finally, the robust agreement between predicted and empiric data serves to validate a semiquantitative approach to the analysis of BOLD fMRI data. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available