4.2 Article

Plasticity and Genotype x Environment Interactions for Locomotion in Drosophila melanogaster Larvae

Journal

BEHAVIOR GENETICS
Volume 42, Issue 1, Pages 162-169

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10519-011-9490-1

Keywords

D. melanogaster larval locomotion; Larval development; Diallel cross; Plasticity; Genotype x environment interactions

Funding

  1. FONDECYT [1100110]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Locomotion is a primary means by which animals interact with the world. To understand the contribution of genotype x environment interactions to individual differences in D. melanogaster larval locomotion we investigated phenotypic sensitivity to environmental changes in four strains of this species and their F-1 hybrids. We also investigated to what extent flexibility and plasticity of locomotion depend upon larval age. Specifically, we examined larval locomotion at 48 and 96 h of development on three different substrates. Locomotion was influenced by the structure of the substrate, but this depended on both the genotype and larval age. At 48 h of larval development phenotypic variation in locomotion was attributable to both genotype x environment interactions and genotypic differences among the larvae, while at 96 h of age, differences were mainly due to genotype x environment interactions. An analysis of variance of the 4 x 4 diallel cross made at 48 and 96 h of development showed, depending on the cross, either dominance to increase/decrease locomotion, overdominance to increase/decrease locomotion, or no dominance to increase/decrease locomotion. Furthermore, the diversity of behavioral responses in the F-1 hybrids was greater at 96 than at 48 h of larval development. Our results demonstrate that genotype x environment interactions result in plasticity of D. melanogaster larval locomotion, which makes sense in light of the fact that larvae, in the wild, develop in heterogeneous and rapidly changing environments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available