4.2 Article

A Twin Study of the Genetics of High Cognitive Ability Selected from 11,000 Twin Pairs in Six Studies from Four Countries

Journal

BEHAVIOR GENETICS
Volume 39, Issue 4, Pages 359-370

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10519-009-9262-3

Keywords

Genetics; High cognitive ability; Twins; Intelligence; Talent

Funding

  1. John Templeton Foundation [13575]
  2. US National Institute of Child health and Human Development [HD038075, HD046167, HD44454, HD46167]
  3. The Twins Early Development Study (United Kingdom): UK Medical Research Council [G0500079]
  4. Minnesota Twin Family Study (USA): USPHS [AA009367, R01 DA005147, R01 DA013240]
  5. Colorado Twin Studies (USA): LTS [HD19802, HD010333, HD18426, MH043899]
  6. MacArthur Foundation
  7. CTS: [VA1296.07.1629B, DA011015]
  8. MRC [G0500079, G19/2] Funding Source: UKRI
  9. Medical Research Council [G0500079, G9817803B, G19/2] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although much genetic research has addressed normal variation in intelligence, little is known about the etiology of high cognitive abilities. Using data from 11,000 twin pairs (age range = 6-71 years) from the genetics of high cognitive abilities consortium, we investigated the genetic and environmental etiologies of high general cognitive ability (g). Age-appropriate psychometric cognitive tests were administered to the twins and used to create g scores standardized within each study. Liability-threshold model fitting was used to estimate genetic and environmental parameters for the top 15% of the distribution of g. Genetic influence for high g was substantial (0.50, with a 95% confidence interval of 0.41-0.60). Shared environmental influences were moderate (0.28, 0.19-0.37). We conclude that genetic variation contributes substantially to high g in Australia, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and the United States.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available