Total and active thymoglobulin levels: effects of dose and sensitization on serum concentrations

A group of 79 renal transplant patients undergoing acute rejection episodes were treated with Thymoglobulin (TM) (rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin), 1.5 mg/kg/day for 6-14 days as part of a double-blinded trial comparing the efficacy of Thymoglobulin and Atgam (TM) (horse anti-thymocyte globulin). Serial serum samples from the patients were tested to determine the level of Thymoglobulin (i.e. rabbit IgG levels = total Thymoglobulin) and anti-Thymoglobulin using ELISAs. Antibodies binding to human lymphocytes (active Thymoglobulin), were determined by flow cytometry; no correlation was seen between treatment efficacy and either active or total Thymoglobulin concentrations; the overall treatment success rate was 86%. Pharmacokinetics of total and active Thymoglobulin were distinctly different; active Thymoglobulin disappeared much more rapidly: only 12% of patients had detectable active Thymoglobulin by day 90 compared to 81% of patients with detectable total Thymoglobulin; percent active Thymoglobulin decreased from a peak of 0.56-0.7% during treatment, to 0.07-0.35% by day 21, and less than 0.14% by day 30. Thymoglobulin and active Thymoglobulin concentrations were modeled by multiple regression. Using dose number and sensitization as independent variables, 47-76% of the variability seen in interpatient Thymoglobulin levels could be explained, while for active Thymoglobulin levels, the measured variables accounted for 13-48% of the observed interpatient variation. We conclude that: (1) for a group of patients receiving primary Thymoglobulin treatment (averaging nine full and one partial dose per patient), neither Thymoglobulin nor active Thymoglobulin levels are predictive of treatment outcome; (2) active Thymoglobulin disappears more rapidly from the circulation than total Thymoglobulin; and (3) patients that develop anti-rabbit IgG antibodies clear Thymoglobulin and active Thymoglobulin more rapidly than unsensitized patients. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.