4.3 Article

Modeling spatial variation in waterfowl band-recovery data

Journal

JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT
Volume 65, Issue 4, Pages 726-737

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.2307/3803023

Keywords

band-recovery models; capture-recapture; Markov chain Monte Carlo; random effects; spatial modeling; spatial statistics; waterfowl banding; waterfowl harvest rate

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Historically, the statistical complexity of modeling spatial relationships in band-recovery data has limited the use of spatial models in the management of waterfowl populations. Consequently, managers have assumed simplified spatial relationships (e.g., by stratification and pooling data over large geographic areas) to obtain spatially explicit estimates of vital rates. As an alternative. we used a binomial random effects approach it) modeling spatial variation in band-recovery, data. The model accommodates spatial correlation and heterogeneity in recovery rates and facilitates spatially explicit estimation of recovery, rates with sparse data and at arbitrary levels of spatial resolution. Although the model is structurally simple, estimation using conventional likelihood techniques is complex. Instead, we rely on a technique known as Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulation. We used this model to construct a map of mallard (Anas platyrhynchos) recovery rates on a relatively fine-grained grid and for estimation of recovery rates within predefined geographic strata. The results show a strong gradient in recovery rate. with lower values in the western United States and higher values in the eastern United States. The spatial correlation in the model allows useful stratum-level estimates to be produced for strata with small sample sizes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available