4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Preoperative administration of steroids:: Influence on adhesion molecules and cytokines after cardiopulmonary bypass

Journal

ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY
Volume 72, Issue 4, Pages 1316-1320

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0003-4975(01)03062-4

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is associated with tissue damage mediated by adhesion molecules and cytokines. Prebypass steroid administration may modulate the inflammatory response, resulting in improved postoperative recovery. Methods. Fifty patients undergoing elective coronary operations under normothermic CPB were randomized into two groups: group A (n = 24) received intravenous methylprednisolone (10 mg/kg) 4 hours preoperatively, and group B (n = 26) served as controls. Cytokines (tumor necrosis factor-alpha [TNF-alpha], interleukin-2R [IL-2R], IL-6, IL-8), soluble adhesion molecules (sE-selectin, sI-CAM-1), C-reactive protein, and leukocytes were measured before steroid application, then 24 and 48 hours, and 6 days postoperatively. Adhesion molecules were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, cytokines by chemiluminescent immunoassay. Postoperatively, hemodynamic measurements, inotropic agent requirements, blood loss, duration of mechanical ventilation, and intensive care unit stay were compared. Results. Aortic cross-clamp and CPB time was similar in both groups. Prednisolone administration reduced postoperative levels of IL-6 (611 versus 92.7 pg/mL, p = 0.003), TNF-alpha (24.4 versus 11.0 pg/L, p = 0.02), and E-selectin (327 versus 107 ng/mL, p = 0.02). Postoperative recovery did not differ between groups. Conclusions. Preoperative administration of methylprednisolone blunted the increase of IL-6, TNF-alpha, and E-selectin levels after CPB but had no measurable effect on postoperative recovery. (C) 2001 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available