4.6 Article

Clobetasol propionate in the treatment of premenarchal vulvar lichen sclerosus

Journal

OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY
Volume 98, Issue 4, Pages 588-591

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1016/S0029-7844(01)01496-X

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of treating premenarchal vulvar lichen sclerosus with clobetasol propionate. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed of girls presenting to the University of Michigan Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology Clinic from January, 1995, to July, 2000, with premenarchal lichen sclerosus. Subjects in the study were treated with topical clobetasol propionate ointment 0.05% for 2-4 weeks, and then tapered to a less potent steroid. Information was extracted concerning age at onset, symptoms, vulvar examination, previous treatments, effectiveness of clobetasol follow-up, and complications. The parents were contacted for a follow-up telephone survey. RESULTS: Fifteen girls averaging 5.7 years at the start of symptoms met criteria. The diagnosis of lichen sclerosus was made visually in I I and by biopsy in four. Follow-up ranged from 2 months to 6 years. Fourteen girls had good improvement within 4-7 weeks. One girl developed a yeast superinfection and one developed transient erythema. At least I year of follow-up by clinic visit or telephone interview was available in 11 girls. Of these 11, two girls had no further vulvar symptoms after the initial treatment, five had one or two total flares, three reported three to eight flares per year, and one girl continues to be unresponsive to therapy. CONCLUSION: Clobetasol propionate was an effective treatment of premenarchal vulvar lichen sclerosus in this small group; however, recurrences were common and required additional steroid treatment. Furthermore, complications of treatment were infrequent, minor, and easily treatable. (C) 2001 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available