4.6 Review

Particulate and vapor phase constituents of cigarette mainstream smoke and risk of myocardial infarction

Journal

ATHEROSCLEROSIS
Volume 158, Issue 2, Pages 257-267

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0021-9150(01)00570-6

Keywords

mainstream smoke; atherogenic potential; arrhythmia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

On pharmacological and compositional grounds, cigarette mainstream smoke (MS) aerosol can be broadly categorized as consisting of the following constituents: carbon monoxide, other vapor phase components, particulate matter ('tar') and nicotine. The relative risk of coronary artery disease for smoking 20 cigarettes per day has been estimated by meta-analysis of five large prospective epidemiology studies to be 1.78. These four major smoke components are simultaneously delivered to the active smoker as a complex aerosol composed of several billion semi-liquid particles per cm(3) within the mixture of combustion gases. Fractional attribution of the 78% increase in reported risk to a given constituent is problematic because of the complex mixture. However, a significant literature exists which suggests that some general statements regarding smoke constituent-associated risks for development or exacerbation of myocardial infarction are supportable. First, the atherogenic potential of MS is associated with the particulate and vapor phases and not with CO. Nicotine might exert an indirect effect on atherosclerotic plaque development by increasing shear forces in main conduction arteries. Similarly, the thrombogenic potential is associated primarily with the particulate and vapor phases and also possibly with nicotine via platelet aggregation. Vasoconstriction probably results from the actions of nicotine and hypoxia from carbon monoxide. Finally, the arrhythmia-inducing potential may result from catecholamine release following nicotine exposure, with a questionable contribution from carbon monoxide. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available