4.7 Article

Biological productivity during sapropel S5 formation in the Eastern Mediterranean Sea: Evidence from stable isotopes of nitrogen and carbon

Journal

GEOCHIMICA ET COSMOCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 65, Issue 19, Pages 3249-3266

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0016-7037(01)00668-8

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We determined N-15/N-14 ratios in modern surface and sapropel S5 sediments of the Mediterranean Sea to clarify differences in the nutrient regime associated with sapropel formation. In the modern situation, high delta N-15 of unused nitrate (15-20 parts per thousand) remaining in the surface waters during the winter phytoplankton bloom evidences P-limitation of biological production in winter. delta N-15 of surface sediments decrease towards the east of the basin (5 to >2.5 parts per thousand). This is a consequence of either eastward increasing nitrogen fixation during the summer months, or of particulate matter being supplied predominantly by the P-limited winter bloom. Very low (-1-1 parts per thousand) delta N-15 values in sapropel S-5 from four locations require a very light source of nutrient-N assimilated at a minimum of ten times the modem export flux. Because the isochronous. records show no spatial gradient in delta N-15, we exclude both Ekinan-type upwelling and direct riverine discharge as likely sources of nutrients. Our data are consistent with an anti-estuarine thermohaline circulation in the upper 500m during S5 time, allowing for the trapping of nutrients in the eastern basin. The most Rely scenario for S5 is that phosphorus release from a relatively shallow redox boundary resulted in an imbalanced supply of N:P (< 16:1) to the photic zone. The result was a slow assimilation of carbon during summer stratification and extensive N-2-fixation providing the majority of the export flux from a N-limited system. Copyright (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available