4.5 Article

Negative ionospheric storm coincident with DE 1-observed thermospheric disturbance on October 14, 1981

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS
Volume 106, Issue A10, Pages 21049-21062

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2000JA000209

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The DE 1 far ultraviolet (FUV) imaging instrument recorded a large thermospheric disturbance over Europe and Russia on October 14, 1981, during a geomagnetic storm commencing near the end of the previous day. The disturbance is quantified in terms of O/N-2 the column density ratio referenced to a fixed depth in N-2. The ratio is derived from DE 1 dayglow observations with a filter whose signal transmission is dominated by O I 130.4-nm emission. Within the disturbed region, O/N-2 is less than that in surrounding regions, with minimum values being more than a factor of 2 smaller than undisturbed values. Images of O/N-2 are compared to ground-based ionosonde data from 13 sites, some within and others outside of the disturbed region. The data are in the form of N-max, the maximum electron density, which in the presence of an F-2 layer is equivalent to NmF(2). The data exhibit negative ionospheric storm effects (reduced N-max) within the disturbed region and normal behavior elsewhere. The degree of correlation between O/N-2 and N-max suggests that the approximate geographical extent of dayside regions experiencing negative ionospheric storm effects can be determined from global FUV imaging of the disturbed and surrounding regions. The analysis is extended to the following day to address the recovery of the disturbed region. The O/N-2 ratio has returned to undisturbed values except in a smaller disturbance region containing weak reductions in O/N-2. This is either a remnant of the strong disturbance from the day before or a newly formed disturbance from substorm activity several hours prior to the new observations. Only the ionosonde sites within this region recorded values of Nm below their monthly median values.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available