4.2 Article

Brain volume changes on longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging in normal older people

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROIMAGING
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages 393-400

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1552-6569.2001.tb00068.x

Keywords

brain volume; aging; longitudinal; magnetic resonance imaging; stereology

Funding

  1. NIA NIH HHS [AG 09693] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDCD NIH HHS [P01 DC 02952] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and Purpose. The purpose of this study is to investigate the longitudinal age-related changes in human brain volume using stereological methods. Methods. Sixty-six older participants (34 men, 32 women, age [mean SD] 78.9 +/- 3.3 years, range 74-87 years) with normal baseline and follow-up examinations underwent 2 MRIs (magnetic resonance imaging) of the brain on average 4.4 years apart. The volumes of the cerebrum (defined as cortex, basal ganglia, thalamus, and white matter), lateral ventricles, and cerebellum were estimated on the 2 MRIs using an unbiased stereological method (Cavalieri principle). Results. The annual decrease (mean SD) of the cerebral volume was 2.1% +/- 1.6% (P < .001). The average volume of the lateral ventricles on the second MRI was increased by 5.6% +/- 3.6% per year (P < .001). The average volume of the cerebellum on the second MRI was decreased by 1.2% +/- 2.2% per year (P < .001). Even though the average cerebral volume was significantly different between men and women on initial MRI and second MRI, the percentage change of the age-related cerebral volume decrease in male and female brains between initial MRI and second MRI were identical. Conclusions. The findings showed that there was age-related atrophy of cerebrum and cerebellum and age-related disproportional enlargement of lateral ventricles in normal older men and women.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available