4.6 Article

Ibuprofen pharmacokinetics in preterm infants with patent ductus arteriosus

Journal

CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS
Volume 70, Issue 4, Pages 336-343

Publisher

MOSBY, INC
DOI: 10.1067/mcp.2001.118453

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Our objective was to study the pharmacokinetics of ibuprofen in premature infants with patent ductus arteriosus on day 3 and day 5 after birth. Methods: Ibuprofen was administered on days 3, 4, and 5 by a 15-minute intravenous infusion of 10, 5, and 5 mg/kg, respectively, with the aim of closing the ductus arteriosus. Blood samples were drawn at time zero and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 12, and 24 hours after the first and third doses. Ibuprofen plasma concentrations were assayed by HPLC. Results. A total of 27 premature infants were included (gestational age, 28.6 +/- 1.9 weeks; birth weight, 1250 +/- 460 g; values are mean +/- standard deviation). Ibuprofen pharmacokinetics followed a 2-compartment open model. Between the first and third doses (day 3 and day 5) there was a significant decrease of the volume of distribution of the central compartment (Vd(c)) (0.244 versus 0.171 L/kg; P = .03) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (524 versus 447 mg (.) h/L; P = .01). The decrease in Vd(c) was most pronounced in patients with a closing ductus. Total body clearance and plasma half-life did not change significantly. No significant differences were observed in ibuprofen peak plasma concentrations after the first and third doses in relation to ductal status after treatment. Conclusion: Ibuprofen pharmacokinetics showed a large interindividual variation in premature infants during treatment for patent ductus arteriosus, and significant changes may occur between day 3 and day 5 after birth in those infants with a closing ductus. These findings may have implications for the treatment schedule with ibuprofen in patients with patent ductus arteriosus.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available