4.7 Article

One-, two-, and three-dimensional root water uptake functions for transient modeling

Journal

WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH
Volume 37, Issue 10, Pages 2457-2470

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2000WR000027

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although solutions of multidimensional transient water flow can be obtained by numerical modeling, their application may be limited as root water uptake is generally considered to be one- or two-dimensional only. This is especially the case for trees. The first objective of this paper is to test the suitability of a three-dimensional root water uptake model for the simultaneous simulation of transient soil water flow around an almond tree. The soil hydraulic and root water uptake parameters were optimized by minimizing the residuals between measured and simulated water content data. Water content was measured in a three-dimensional grid around a sprinkler-irrigated almond tree for a 16 day period, following irrigation. A second objective was to compare the performance and results of the three-dimensional flow model with one- and two-dimensional root water uptake models. For this purpose, measured water contents were aggregated in the x and y direction in the one-dimensional case and in the radial direction for the two-dimensional uptake model. For the estimation of root water uptake model parameters a genetic algorithm was used to estimate the approximate global minimum of the parameter space, whereas final parameters were determined using the Simplex optimization algorithm. With the optimized root water uptake parameters, simulated and measured water contents during the 16-day period were in excellent agreement for all root water uptake models. Most significantly, the spatial variation in flux density below the rooting zone decreased when reducing multidimensional root water uptake to fewer dimensions, thereby justifying the proposed multidimensional approach.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available