3.9 Article

The treatment of cerebrospinal fluid shunt infections - Results from a practice survey of the American Society of Pediatric Neurosurgeons

Journal

PEDIATRIC NEUROSURGERY
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages 205-210

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000050422

Keywords

ventriculoperitoneal shunt; infection; treatment; practice survey

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It is our impression that the management strategy for infected cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunts varies significantly among pediatric neurosurgeons. The purpose of this paper is to present the results of a practice survey on the treatment of shunt infections which was distributed to all active members of the American Society of Pediatric Neurosurgeons (ASPN). Eighty-four of 129 ASPN members (65%) responded to the survey. Most ASPN members remove the shunt and place an external ventricular drain (EVD) to treat Staphylococcus epidermidis (59.5%), S. aureus (64.3%) and gram-negative rod infections (67.9%). The second most common method of treatment was externalization of the shunt (33.3, 29.8 and 25%, respectively). The duration of antibiotic treatment was extremely variable. When the shunt was removed and an EVD inserted, the duration of antibiotic treatment for S. epidermidis and S. aureus ranged from 5 to 21 total days (2-21 days of sterile cultures). For gram-negative rod infections treated with shunt removal and an EVD, the total duration of antibiotic therapy ranged from 5 to 24 days (2-37 days of sterile cultures). The majority of ASPN members remove the infected CSF shunt and place an EVD for the management of shunt infections. Significant variation exists in the duration of antibiotic therapy. Determining the most effective duration of antibiotic therapy in an effort to shorten hospitalization and minimize complications without sacrificing efficacy will require further study. Copyright (C) 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available