4.4 Article

Absence of jaagsiekte sheep retrovirus DNA and RNA in bronchioloalveolar and conventional human pulmonary adenocarcinoma by PCR and RT-PCR analysis

Journal

HUMAN PATHOLOGY
Volume 32, Issue 10, Pages 1039-1042

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO
DOI: 10.1053/hupa.2001.28249

Keywords

jaagsiekte; virus; bronchioalveolar; adenocarcinoma; polymerase chain reaction

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bronchioloalveolar adenocarcinoma (BAC) morphologically resembles sheep pulmonary adenomatosis (SPA), a contagious ovine pulmonary adenocarcinoma caused by the jaagsiekte sheep retrovirus (JSRV). Previously, positivity for JSRV by immunostaining, reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), and Western blot was reported in most nonmucinous BACs. Our objective in this study was to analyze additional BAC subtypes and conventional adenocarcinomas (CA) to further substantiate this association. Tumor tissue was microdissected from unstained paraffin sections of 26 cases of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded BAC (7 mucinous, 17 nonmucinous, 2 sclerosing) and 29 cases of CA. Positive controls consisted of 2 separate paraffin blocks of known SPA. Primer sequences were derived that were capable of hybridizing to all reported strain variants of both the DNA (endogeneous) and RNA (exogenous) forms of JSRV. Each sample was tested using both PCR (DNA) and RT-PCR (RNA). All BAC and CA cases were negative for JSRV. Positive controls yielded PCR products that were sequenced and precisely matched the published prototype stain of JSRV. To control for negative effects of tissue fixation, dilutions of positive control tissue were added to BAC and CA samples. Detection of JSRV was evident at 1:50 dilution. Although the possibility of a viral association with BAC cannot be excluded, this study shows that the association with JSRV is probably very weak, if present at all. Hum PATHOL 32:1039-1042. Copyright (C) 2001 by W.B. Saunders Company.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available