4.6 Article

Release of a humoral circulating cardioprotective factor by remote ischemic preconditioning is dependent on preserved neural pathways in diabetic patients

Journal

BASIC RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY
Volume 107, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00395-012-0285-1

Keywords

Ischemic preconditioning; Diabetes; Humoral; Neural; Ischemia; Reperfusion

Funding

  1. Leducq [06CVD]
  2. Danish Research Council [11-108354]
  3. Danish Strategic Research Council [11-115818]
  4. Aarhus University Institute of Clinical Medicine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Efficacy of ischemic preconditioning is decreased in animal models of type 2 diabetes mellitus while the responses in humans with diabetes are contradictory. It is unknown whether attenuation is related to decreased release of a mediating humoral cardioprotective factor or reduced ability to respond in the target tissue. The aim of the present study was to investigate the release and effect of a circulating cardioprotective factor in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. Blood samples were drawn from nine non-diabetic subjects, eight diabetic patients without peripheral neuropathy, and eight diabetic patients with peripheral neuropathy before (control) and after a remote ischemic preconditioning (rIPC) stimulus. Blood samples were dialyzed against Krebs-Henseleit buffer and the cardioprotective effects of the dialysates were tested in rabbit hearts mounted on a Langendorff model and subjected to 30-min global ischemia and 120-min reperfusion. rIPC dialysate from nondiabetic and diabetic subjects without peripheral neuropathy reduced infarct size and improved hemodynamic recovery compared to control dialysate from non-diabetic and diabetic subjects. However, in the subgroup of diabetic patients with neuropathy the cardioprotective effect was attenuated. These findings indicate that the release mechanism involves neural pathways.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available