4.5 Article

Using restriction fragment length polymorphisms to assess temporal variation and estimate the number of ascospores that initiate epidemics in field populations of Mycosphaerella graminicola

Journal

PHYTOPATHOLOGY
Volume 91, Issue 10, Pages 1011-1017

Publisher

AMER PHYTOPATHOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1094/PHYTO.2001.91.10.1011

Keywords

gene flow; genetic drift; population stability; primary inoculum; reproductive mode

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs) and DNA fingerprints were used to assess temporal variation and estimate the effective population size of the wheat pathogen Mycosphaerella graminicola over a 6-year period. In each year, the fungal population was founded by ascospores originating from outside the sampled fields. A total of 605 fungal isolates were included in this study. Our results indicate that the genetic structure of these M. graminicola populations were stable over the 6-year period. The common alleles at each RFLP locus were present at similar frequencies each year. More than 99% of gene diversity was distributed within populations sampled from the same year and less than 1% was attributed to differences among years. The lack of population differentiation among collections taken in different years indicated that the effective size of the source population was sufficiently large that genetic drift was insignificant in this location. It also suggests that the initial colonists from ascospore founder populations were a fair reflection of the source population. We estimate that the effective sizes of these field populations ranged from 3,400 to 700,000 individuals, depending on the size of the field sampled and assumptions about mutation rates. Estimates of the number of ascospores initiating epidemics of leaf blotch disease in each field plot and factors that contribute to the large effective population size of M. graminicola are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available