4.5 Article

Supplementary feeding of wild birds indirectly affects the local abundance of arthropod prey

Journal

BASIC AND APPLIED ECOLOGY
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages 286-293

Publisher

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.baae.2012.03.001

Keywords

Avian supplementary feeding; Bird feeding; Domestic gardens; Pea aphids; Predator exclusion; Prey depletion; Urban ecology; Urban ornithology

Categories

Funding

  1. BBSRC doctoral training award

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Providing supplementary food for wild birds is a globally popular pastime; almost half of the households in many developed countries participate and billions of US dollars are spent annually. Although the direct influence of this additional resource on bird survivorship and fecundity has been studied, there is little understanding of the wider ecological consequences of this massive perturbation to (what are usually) urban ecosystems. We investigated the possible effects of wild bird feeding on the size and survivorship of colonies of a widespread arthropod prey species of many small passerine birds, the pea aphid [Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris); Hemiptera: Aphididae], in suburban gardens in a large town in southern England. We found significantly fewer aphids and shorter colony survival times in colonies exposed to avian predation compared to protected controls in gardens with a bird feeder but no such differences between exposed and protected colonies in gardens that did not feed birds. Our work therefore suggests that supplementary feeding of wild birds in gardens may indirectly influence population sizes and survivorship of their arthropod prey and highlights the need for further research into the potential effects on other species.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available